I'm looking into both as well and leaning towards the 262 because I have no use for video with this purchase and I love the shutter. Or pictures are completely similar? And the EVF is a very helpful feature sometime. - 35mmc, https://matthewtrader.com/leica-m262-review-after-photographing-my-nieces-5th-birthday-party, Nikon 28ti and 35ti - Mini-Review - By Ahmed Al Shorouqi, 5 frames with the Nikon FM2 & Agfa APX 400 in my Paris - By Martina Rigotti, Camera, Lens, Film and Peripheral Kit Reviews. And then I got a Sony A7riii that lets me touch the screen to pick the subject I want the camera to autofocus on! The better screen, slightly improved interface and even fairly small things like the artificially lit frame lines introduced in the M240 made the the camera feel more mature. Hence, I literally could not give a single poop what Para thinks . Im really glad I ordered it, the best Leica M camera Ive ever used! Ive had it for a month now. Although I know right from the gate that my M-P Typ 240 wont get as much use as my new heart winning M9-P, it will however keep me from having that inevitable internal debate of owning just one old or new M body. Above $2500 cameras tend to become increasingly specialized, making it difficult to select a 'best' option. On the M240 the highlight from focus peaking is often not apparent at all. Released only weeks apart, the Sony 50mm F1.4 GM and Sigma F1.4 DG DN Art are clear competitors. Intro Sample Images Lenses Specs Performance. I decided that I wanted to keep the one camera that can do close to everything I need in the digital world (and for me, this includes personal and occasional professional work, mostly product still photography, but also videography). I remember initially thinking that the colours coming out of the M10 files seemed thin when compared to those of the M240 and the photos in your review of the M262 have reminded me of that. I upgrade cameras, selling them and adding a little bit of funds from what disposable income I do have, also relying on credit a bit too much. Another M10 fetish is better performance at high ISO. If you would like to change your settings or withdraw consent at any time, the link to do so is in our privacy policy accessible from our home page.. The only shortcoming relating to the auto ISO function is that sometimes I feel like Id like to be able to see the ISO the camera is choosing on a shot by shot basis. Phase-detection autofocus is much faster than a contrast detection autofocus, allowing for sharper images. You mirror my sentiments about the camera to a t! On the Leica M262 the thumb dial can be set to control exposure compensation. As cboy pointed out above, that may limit lens choice. And if you are not interested in movies or EVF, as a.Noctilux said, you can ignore them. Adjusting colours always feels like a headache, but is one Ive broadly avoided with this camera. One video compares the sound of the shutter to the the M-E. Jump to content . I should say though, this is probably because none of my other digital cameras work like this if this was my only digital camera, I would likely have gotten used to a lot quicker. Mostly because I wanted to shoot below 0.7m and Id have to use Live View for that. great output, but cant get a shot off faster than with the M8. To me this seems like a hassle. I cant. Can you compare side by side, please? I was wrong! The more focus points the more flexibility in picking which part of the scene to focus on. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.Sign uphere. Epson RD1 style I loved my RD1! With ACR, my standard daylight setting for the M240 is 5300/10, while with the M262, it is 5000/0, both with embedded profile. I have both and haven't noticed any difference but I haven't done a side by side comparison. !if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-box-4','ezslot_13',182,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-box-4-0'); One way or another, in the time Ive been using the camera, Ive not got used to this little issue, though I have at least learned to live with it. It tells you : take your time, have fun with the manual focus, enjoy the concepts small is beautiful and less is more, listen to the music made by the shutter, look how discret you are when shooting and readily agreed, leave the arm race to the geek and feel free to take pictures your way.Shooting with the M262 is as simple and as pleasant as a walk in the forest in summer. Ah yes, sorry, of course the screen is actually useful! Sometimes, colours from M262 can be a bit more saturated than from M240, but as I use them only in recording DNG, post work can do what I want. Waiting for the fishy in the little dishy by Gil Aegerter, Lava Lizard on Marine Iguana by ZimmWisdom. Funnily enough, when searching to find out if I was the only one to notice this, I found this post on a forum where someone finds the same issue, but prefers the cooler screen of his Leica M240 to the later M-P version of the M240 which seems to have the same warmer screen as my M262. But the I needed a 21mm for crowd shots and discovered the live view is awesome for this. Cant quite stretch to the Summicron or Summilux at the moment All the best and, no doubt, I will be on here again soon with myriad questions! As I don't need money selling them "cheap", I'm happy to keep them all for what they are, using each one equally. Survey: Third-party Lenses for Leica M-Mount , Umfrage: Dritthersteller Objektive fr Leica M-Mount . This page is currently only available in English. Leaving aside the video recording, the main difference is the simplified menu of the 262 v the live view of the 240. Hey all, I've owned an M6 for several years and in the next few months will be unloading a few of my higher-end film cameras to (downsize and) purchase a digital Leica to compliment my M6. It was the third major iteration of colour digital Leica M . Pasted as rich text. Paste as plain text instead, I upgraded to the M240 from an M9, had it for 3 months and went back to an M9. I dont need to get excited by them dont get me wrong, theres fun in a camera that provides some sort of novelty initially, but longer-term I just need my cameras to work in a way that suits me. For a start, the battery in the M262 was a lot bigger than that in the M9. The colour differences between the two are due to slightly different colour handling in the camera and can be cancelled out completely by the camera profiles in LR. Im not going to go into details here to be honest. We have the top best product and truth reviews that will help make your decision easy. Clear editor. I need a new 50mm lens. A raw image file contains minimally processed data from the image sensor. I love using that camera but want a digitals instant gratification and ease of image development (Im lazy). Our camera evaluations and conclusions are based . The thing is, I much prefer the warm display on the M262. I have purchased an M262 and, given my budget, a Voigtlander Ultron 35mm (which I have read is actually a really good lens). If live view/video is a don't care then buy the lower cost camera. You have to ask yourself, . Theres a certain robustness or heft to the M240/M262 files that I personally dont see in the M10 files, and that is likely a result of the different sensors used in the cameras. The LEICA M typ 240 offers a much quieter shutter than the M9, as well as LEICA's first option for an external electronic viewfinder (EVF), the . We were shooting inside a large carpet manufacturers in Kidderminster and I was trying to get some slightly abstract well timed shots of the various goings on in the factory. I currently have a q which is a lot of fun but I'm more interested in a rangefinder at this point. As I mentioned in my recent post about the M240, the stripped-back interface was exactly reason . I shouldve read the manual! Raw files are so named because they are not yet processed and therefore are not ready to be printed or edited with a bitmap graphics editor. In case you're confused, the M240 was the camera that followed the Leica M9. 1) Slimmer - The M10 has a slimmer camera body than the M240, similar to the Leica film cameras such as a Leica M6. Can you advice,please, if you still own both cameras: why some people says that m262 perform better colors? The entire camera feels built to last and like a well engineered tool in use. The build quality of the M 262 is impeccable. The LEICA M typ 240 is the world's second full-frame mirrorless camera. Usability is great (with some of the limitations you mentioned), and image quality of the 262 is certainly superb, and the main reason (aside from usability and a good sensor), at least for me, the Leica M glass, is a topic somebody else can cover much better than I can. Weight is certainly a thing though! By continuing to browse our site, you agree to our use of cookies. The Leica M [typ 262], or M262 for short offers whats best described as a stripped-back user interface. If tapping the top plate sounded a bit hollow: remember its aluminium not brass in the 262, Sure. That alone justifies the decision to buy. The M262 was the stripped-back camera that came after the M240 and before the M10 and as regular readers of this website will know, I do like a stripped-back camera.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[580,400],'35mmc_com-medrectangle-3','ezslot_10',180,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-medrectangle-3-0'); Leica must have listened to some of their users who felt that they didnt need a lot of the features that the Leica M240 offered them, and created a camera that felt a little more like a natural progression from the M9. Im not sure about the iso dial though, I feel like thats a feature that would really suit me. It's small, light, cheap and extremely wide but is it any good? I typically use a 75mm lens on my M 262. Paste as plain text instead, Heres some photos: Bear in mind, these have been taken with a load of different lenses:if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[250,250],'35mmc_com-leader-3','ezslot_21',189,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-leader-3-0'); if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-leader-2','ezslot_20',190,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-leader-2-0'); In conclusion, the Leica M262 is a fantastic camera with a great interface with very few issues worth picking holes in. My biggest issue in day-to-day use was the control over the ISO, which I find leaves me a little disconnected from what setting Im using. They take on a garish orange tint that is hard to process in LR. Why torture yourself? has a removable battery. High quality battery charger is a handy companion for digital shooting. The Digital Leica M Samples Gallery (Any digital M from M8 to M-D 262) Below are all images taken with a digital Leica M from the 240 to the m_P to the M-D, the latest and greatest M Rangefinders from Leica Camera. After a few weeks of using the new Leica M262 I posted a review along with a few videos. At 0.68 magnification itll be hard to push to 75mm without a magnifier eyepiece x1.25 or x1.4. Yes, it adds a Wi-Fi connectivity, which is something completely new in my workflow, but the overall experience is so much simpler. This has become a bit of a trend now, I buy a digital Leica, shoot with it for a while, decide to sell it for one reason or another, and then scramble to write about it in the final few days of owning it. I like to do a lot of still lifeand some close-up and macro work. Ive read all too often from M10 owners how much they miss an M9 or M8 variant because of the simplicity and CCD image quality. It was at this early stage that I noticed the first thing that has continued to make me scratch my head throughout the time I used the camera. After the M11 released though, used prices of the M10 dropped and I decided to get one. Help us by suggesting a value. With 100% coverage, you can compose the image correctly when you capture the photo. Thankfully with the M10 theyve returned to the old system. Using an M this way does not give me the same fundamental photography pleasure as the M8 or M-9P do, but, what it does give me is the ability to scratch the inevitable itch that eventually comes to every M8/9/ME user the desire to use their M for other tasks theirs just cannot do (macro work, adapting other lenses for example). As the cameras are meant to have identical sensors, do we think this is just new owner's biased impressions (nothing wrong with that btw) is could there be something in this? I was even contemplating selling my Leica lenses and the M3 as well, but I love using that film M system (and film photography) so much that I could not do it (at least not yet)! Im not loaded, but I do focus almost all my disposable income on this. 20% better video recording quality (main camera), Has continuous autofocus when recording movies, has continuous autofocus when recording movies. With sensor shift, the image sensor (rather than the lens) moves to counterbalance any vibration of the camera. My primary reasons for upgrading were: better high ISO capabilities ie. In the real world, I was making the M9 work for me in terms of low light shooting, as such, I have literally never found a single issue with high ISO noise from the M262. The ideas with Leica is identities. I just bought a M262.Its my 3rd Leica M (after a M6 and a M240) and each time I come back to a M, its a delight. By comparison, the Leica M240 had a lot of features many of which, as Ive alluded to, were seen by some as not needed on a Leica M rangefinder. Ill have to dig out an online manual , I got an 262 you have to press SET after choosing- only with 3 button possiblewith latest software (2021). Equally, if I dont find anything particularly bad to say, thats got to be a good thing too, but it doesnt really help in the process of finding things to say. You can get two M-Ps (old and new) for the same price as one M10. Im really enjoying this site since discovering it! Leica claims it uses different technology, whatever that means. Literally. Source: DxOMark. Although it may be possible to choose among other frame rates, those recordings usually have lower resolutions. My first experience discovering I like live-view on a rangefinder was had down the pub quite soon after Id bought the Leica M240. Im not trying to justify myself I certainly wouldnt to trolls the point is simply that I spend my money on something I enjoy. An electronic viewfinder (EVF) with a higher resolution provides a sharper image, producing a view comparable in quality with the one displayed on an optical viewfinder. Everything is very tactile. Whats the best camera for around $2000? Leica has used the button space on the rear of the camera that is used for live view in the Typ 240 to add direct access to the white balance feature. Fortunately, when the image popped up in Lightroom, it was fine or at least it was little different to a photo that I might have expected out of the M262. Yes, the M240s menu is busier, but once I have the camera set up to my liking I dont really venture into the menu often. "It has the same image quality as the Leica M 240" was the . To view the purposes they believe they have legitimate interest for, or to object to this data processing use the vendor list link below. https://www.overgaard.dk/Leica-M-Type-240-aka-Leica-M10-digital-rangefinder-camera-page-44-Focusing-the-Leica-M-with-Manual-Focus-EVF2-Visoflex-Electronic-Viewfinder.html. I am aware many own the Monochrom and love it to death. And thats pushing it. They didn't say it's a different sensor, they said different technology. ins.style.display='block';ins.style.minWidth=container.attributes.ezaw.value+'px';ins.style.width='100%';ins.style.height=container.attributes.ezah.value+'px';container.appendChild(ins);(adsbygoogle=window.adsbygoogle||[]).push({});window.ezoSTPixelAdd(slotId,'stat_source_id',44);window.ezoSTPixelAdd(slotId,'adsensetype',1);var lo=new MutationObserver(window.ezaslEvent);lo.observe(document.getElementById(slotId+'-asloaded'),{attributes:true}); The fact is, I really like them as cameras, but largely speaking they just function for me. Even when recording scenes with a lot of fast movements, the videos are sharp and clear. More microphones result in better sound quality and enable the device to filter out background noise. The M9 and CCD sensor. The image quality of the Leica M240 is outstanding. These were features I wanted to explore whilst I had this camera though I really had very low expectations that they would do much for me. The color profile is quite different too, with more electric blues and purer reds. Great pictures and very interesting. This means the image will be stabilised regardless of what lens is being used. The M240 is a bit slow on the uptake, but I generally leave the camera on while on photo walks so not a real issue.Lock-ups. Resolution is an essential indicator of a screen's image quality, representing the maximum amount of pixels that can be shown on the screen. Can you let me know where you heard that the sensor uses different technology? (they really have me suckered in dont they?!). With the M262 even going away for a long weekend I would debate the need to even take the charger for a single battery. The combination of the live view and the advantages I had begun to feel a physical ISO dial could bring to the table were then enough to have me wondering how much of my kit Id have to sell to change up to the M10. Source: DxOMark. Same lens, same settings - desaturated during RAW conversion. Of all the mentioned digital rangefinders, I enjoyed the [], [] is a definite yes!
leica m240 vs m262 image quality
Posted by